Subject: Re: SDL-News: Priority of signals
From: Ralf Muenzenberger (Ralf.Muenzenberger#informatik.uni-erlangen.de)
Date: Thu Oct 14 1999 - 11:37:21 GMT
The originator of this message is responsible for its content.
-----From Ralf Muenzenberger <Ralf.Muenzenberger#informatik.uni-erlangen.de> to sdlnews -----
> Dear Juan Pablo
>
> I'm afraid that it is not possible to set several priority levels when
> doing
> a PRIORITY INPUT. I think that you should try to use the "enabling
> conditions" (with the keyword "provided").
>
> Your SDL code could look like this:
> STATE idle;
> INPUT sig;
> PROVIDED is_sig_fired = FALSE;
> TASK is_sig_fired := TRUE;
> ...
> INPUT ack;
> PROVIDED is_sig_fired = TRUE;
> ...
>
> A screenshot is included to shows how you can do that with 3 or more
> signals.
>
> I hope this helps
>
> Eric
>
>
Dear Juan Pablo,
I think you need also continuous signals. For example if there istn't a signal "Sig1" in the
input queue and "order" has the value one, than the system can block.
You need for each "enabling condition" one "continuous signal".
Have fun
Ralf
-- I==== Ralf Muenzenberger Phone: +49-9131/85-28339 M // University of Erlangen, IMMD 7 Fax: +49-9131/85-27409 M // Martensstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany-----End text from Ralf Muenzenberger <Ralf.Muenzenberger#informatik.uni-erlangen.de> to sdlnews ----- Join http://www.sdl-forum.org/Society/members.htm for extra SDL Forum Society benefits For help, email "majordomo#sdl-forum.org" with the body of your email as: help or (iff this does not answer your question) email: owner-sdlnews#sdl-forum.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Sun Jun 16 2013 - 10:41:41 GMT