SDL-News: How are "Shared-memory" and "Message passing" expressed differently in SDL?

Subject: SDL-News: How are "Shared-memory" and "Message passing" expressed differently in SDL?
From: D Wang, Electrical & Electronic Engineering (Diyu.Wang#bristol.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:47:06 GMT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: s p: "SDL-News: significance of <<...>> in sdl specification."
• Previous message: Rick Reed TSE: "Re: SDL-News: ADT's for handling generic functions"
• In reply to: Yang LIU: "SDL-News: Operator I defined can't be converted to C"
• Next in thread: Rick Reed TSE: "Re: SDL-News: How are "Shared-memory" and "Message passing" expressed differently in SDL?"
• Reply: D Wang, Electrical & Electronic Engineering: "SDL-News: How are "Shared-memory" and "Message passing" expressed differently in SDL?"

Become an SDL Forum Society member <http://www.sdl-forum.org/Society/members.htm>
The originator of this message is responsible for its content.
-----From "D Wang, Electrical & Electronic Engineering" <Diyu.Wang#bristol.ac.uk> to sdlnews -----

Dear friends,

Are there different constructs in SDL to express (specify) the difference
between "Shared-memory" and "Message passing" mechanisms?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

diyu

--End text from "D Wang, Electrical & Electronic Engineering" <Diyu.Wang#bristol.ac.uk> to sdlnews ---
For extra SDL Forum Society benefits join at <http://www.sdl-forum.org/Society/members.htm>

• Next message: s p: "SDL-News: significance of <<...>> in sdl specification."
• Previous message: Rick Reed TSE: "Re: SDL-News: ADT's for handling generic functions"
• In reply to: Yang LIU: "SDL-News: Operator I defined can't be converted to C"
• Next in thread: Rick Reed TSE: "Re: SDL-News: How are "Shared-memory" and "Message passing" expressed differently in SDL?"
• Reply: D Wang, Electrical & Electronic Engineering: "SDL-News: How are "Shared-memory" and "Message passing" expressed differently in SDL?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a23 : Thu May 09 2013 - 16:05:49 GMT